Since last weekend’s game night I’ve been hearing the same claim: old dice were “wonky,” but modern games are fair because computers handle the randomness. I get the idea, but I’m not sure how true that is across the board. In our family runs we still see hot streaks and dry spells, which makes people suspicious. I’m after a clear, non-mathy explanation I can share with parents and cousins—something short that compares yesterday’s dice to today’s RNG without turning into a lecture.
top of page
bottom of page
I had a feeling my system had a cpu bottle neck, and testing confirmed it. The tool made it easy to understand why my games were underperforming. It even suggested possible fixes and component balance tips. Super helpful for optimizing your PC setup.
Zdravím všechny! O play jonny jsem slyšel od bratrance, který mi o tom mluvil, jako by našel nový způsob relaxu. Nevěřil jsem mu, dokud jsem to sám nezkusil. Stránka působí klidně, všechno je přehledné a hlavně to funguje i na mobilu bez jakýchkoli problémů. Hra má jednoduchý princip, ale dokáže vtáhnout. Občas se tam zdržím déle, než bych chtěl, ale v dobrém slova smyslu – prostě příjemný odpočinek.
Keeping paragraphs short, making sure the page prints cleanly to a single sheet, and noting one small “try it tonight” exercise also nudge folks to actually read, rather than bookmark and forget.
Oddly enough, the way I explain it is that both eras lean on chance, but the tools differ: ancient bone or clay dice could be a bit uneven, while digital games use pseudo-random algorithms that are tested and sometimes wrapped in “guardrails” like bad-luck protection. In the middle of chatting about this with my group, I pointed them to https://techshali.com/from-ancient-dice-to-digital-dreams/ because it connects those dots in plain language—how loot drops, crits, and procedural maps still boil down to rolls, just implemented in code—and why streaks can happen without anything being rigged.